A thin layer over your existing AI subscriptions and API keys. We don't mark up tokens. We don't middleman your data. You pay for the orchestration, dissent engine, and audit infrastructure. Nothing else.
▸ For the independent Keeper
Bring your own keys. No card required.
▸ For decisions that bite back
Or $228/year. Cancel anytime.
▸ For regulated, high-stakes teams
Minimum 3 seats. Annual contracts.
| Feature | Solo | ★ Keeper | Chamber |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seats per session | Up to 3 | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| API seats (BYO keys) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Frontier CLI seats | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open-weight via OpenRouter | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit-grade transcripts | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Read-only sandbox | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Project memory injection | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| PDF / DOCX export | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Canonical decision records | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visual disagreement engine | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Shared team archive | — | — | ✓ |
| SSO / SAML | — | — | ✓ |
| Self-hosted option | — | — | ✓ |
| Audit log → SIEM | — | — | ✓ |
No. You bring your own keys and pay providers directly at their rates. The AI Conclave charges only for the chamber infrastructure: orchestration, dissent engine, audit recording, exports, and project memory.
It stays on your machine. The chamber runs locally. Your prompts, transcripts, and decision records never touch our servers on Solo or Keeper. Chamber teams can choose self-hosted or our hosted infrastructure.
Yes. Set up OpenRouter, point the chamber at it, and you can run a full session without ever touching a frontier provider. Tool-loop reading keeps open-weight seats cost-effective on long contexts.
Because the value compounds the more you use it. Project memory, decision archives, and the Charter all get sharper over time. Solo gives you a real working chamber. Keeper is where it becomes a daily tool.
Fourteen days, no card. If you don't ratify at least one verdict during the trial you've probably picked the wrong tool — refund without questions.
The chamber operates under an internal constitution that governs seat roles, dissent handling, ratification rules, and audit requirements. Keeper users can amend it within bounds. Chamber users can ratify their own.
No. Local-first, single-user is a load-bearing design decision. If we change it, it won't be The AI Conclave anymore.